Originally Posted by
DAL 88 Driver
I won't just avoid them, I flat out won't DO them. I cannot (and will not) sign the release, signifying that I'm adequately rested, for a CDO.
Email already sent to my reps. (For all the good that's going to do.
)
+1..
Originally Posted by
shiznit
All I read is b!tching and moaning from the usual Debbie Downers before ANYONE here has seen the actual language and all the other aspects...
take a deep breath, wind your watch, and wait to see what the REAL LOA TA looks like. It might be a concessionary, it might be marginal, it might be a slam dunk win for the pilots. NONE OF YOU KNOW!
I'm all for fun speculation, but c'mon people, let's give a little bit of credence to the NC and the MEC for taking their time and not rushing to anything back in November..... This took almost 7 month's to hash out... LONGER THAN C2012 NEGOTIATIONS!!!!
I cannot be sure until I've seen it myself, but the evidence points to the fact that the MEC got the message that quality should not be sacrificed for expediency.
My Brother, anything with the name CDO, illegal, standup etc, needs to be banned and not even thought about. Maybe the company can bribe a certain amount of pilots via pay to accept the assignment or sign the release stating they are fit for duty. But I guarantee, fit for duty does not even come close to being the truth as relating to a CDO.
There is no need to even look at the details involving a CDO. It purely is a concession and hypocrisy. Another reason I think the FAA is part management (P117 should ban CDOs and 8+hour domestic).
TEN