Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
That's pure horse****. Most of us who had the balls to accept one or more PDs (and the associated managerial harassment) would rather have taken it to a grievance. But DALPA allowed us to play the role of hostage.
I guess I'd ask how you can defend why "our" "union" offered zero top cover for those who might have needed a loan in their quests to defend the contract.
Really? You would have a preferred a grievance process to what we got?
I guess you could have applied to the furlough emergency relief fund ... cash flow that tight? Goodness. Had no idea.
So which is it? Did you want your association to get you your money ASAP, or drag it out while engaging in meaningless chest beating. I mean if you needed the money it would seem sooner is better.