Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
Let's look at this whole process from management's perspective.
Today, they had a hotwash with their union buster to critique the test run of their C15 strategy. It's called "Divide and Conquer."
Here's how it works:
- the union buster writes a memo that totally ignores the contract. SD signs it.
- DALPA hems, haws and fails to provide decisive leadership, implicitly condoning the memo
- the company takes hostages by monetarily and psychologically penalizing those who stand up for the contract
- DALPA doesn't do jack **** to assist the hostages
- the guys who step up despise DALPA for a lack of backbone
- guys who aren't personally affected see DALPA rolling over; disunity ensues
- several months or years later, DALPA produces an inadequate TA and MD writes a "victory lap" memo
- yada yada yada (the closest description I can manage to describe what just happened)
- we get our asses handed to us a la C12
Bar, you preach "unity" but blindly fail to recognize that DALPA's actions (or inactions) are largely at fault.
To paraphrase Carl:
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
What absolutely intemperate pablum.
What you posted is nothing but pure speculation on your part as to what happened today by the company and DALPA's actions. As you and Carl are so fond of saying:
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
If you have actual evidence to the contrary, please post it.
Otherwise, might I suggest you precede your posts with, "IMO."
Please also refrain from deflecting by accusing me of being an apologist, on FPL, a koolaid drinker, etc. It does nothing but take away any traction you may have on some of your posts, which I actually agree with from time to time.