Originally Posted by
scambo1
I agree the final product is generally solid. It would be really interesting to know how many emails the reps were flailing with. Mine answered me- which was a surprise-after the fact.
As I said earlier, the CDOs don't and probably wont affect me, but once you see them on paper, with how little rest...I had to take a stand against them for the greater good.
I told my rep yes to memrat. Once the CDOs were removed, it was less/not important to me, but I think it should have been memory ratted. It is a pretty significant TA. I was fine with status quo, so I personally was in no hurry.
Agreed all around. I'll take the darts for giving the feedback that I didn't really care about memory rat anymore after the CDOs were removed. Seemed like a big to do over something that was certain to pass by a huge margin.
That being said... perhaps some resolutions in the future to require any scheduling section changes are automatically sent to memory rat are in order. UA has that... I don't disagree with it. Most arguing for memory rat in this case are standing by their principles instead of the logical conclusion that the revised LOA would have certainly passed. Nothing wrong with that. The union doesn't have to spend a million bucks to do every vote for sure.