Originally Posted by
slowplay
I missed this post in the page change. Your search-fu is weak, Fly. Log in to the website and use this
link It is still posted.
The reasons for the failure were posted by the "new" C20 officers (Tucker/Rizutto/Massey) after their first MEC meeting:
Reinstatement of Illegals
Fails-Conflicts with PWA section 12.D.1 and 12.Q. Pending NPRM Flight-Duty
It looks like your council officers kept you up to date. Surprising that you didn't remember something that has become so contentious
The usual suspects? Not quite the way you envisioned, eh?
OK, fair enough - I was just searching for the resolutions. That said it in no way ties the failed CDO language in the TA to originating from a C20 LEC that failed to progress the at the MEC level. Connect the dots on how a failed 4 year old MEC resolution led to direction by the MEC to include that language.
If it
was direction, as opposed to NC originated, then it had to be the will of the body as a majority, in which case the MEC owns it.
I sort of doubt they just all of a sudden decided to resurrect the issue and vote as a majority to include it the TA out of respect for a 4 year old C20 resolution
I guess C20 only gets the credit when it's unpopular or when looking for political cover. Too bad the direction and discussion was in executive session and not public or I doubt you'd be getting away with the state sponsored slime.
Also too bad that Scrappies amazing powers of engagement with the company and the ability to negotiate last minute changes on the fly weren't put to use back in the C2012 TA.