Originally Posted by
LeineLodge
I was responding to your post about the MEC (co-company as you call them) negotiating a cost-neutral deal. If you can show YOUR math that ADG of 5:15 and a 14 hour reroute rule DOESN'T increase the company's cost, then I'm all ears...
Line item accounting wasn't shown in open session at the meeting - which you knew. I wasn't able to see the math, line by line, but when the opened the room back up the NC and reps all openly used the figures +$38M and +137 jobs.
If you have a basis for your implied assertion that the NC/MEC is lying to us then I suggest you dig a little further with your C20 reps. I'm all for exposing a conspiracy - let us know what you find out.
My statement was one of questioning whether this is yet another cost neutral engagement. Without having the actual data, it certainly looks to me like we gave something for everything we got in a time of sustained record profits. You responded to me by saying this:
Originally Posted by
LeineLodge
What part of +38M/year and +137 pilots don't you understand?
Certainly sounded like you were stating facts, so I asked for documentation. You can't show it. Neither can I. Thus my question still stands.
Carl