Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
T Square,
Our MEC is IMHO the world's best when it comes to finding leverage.
I do not expect this flow to deliver the operational reliability Richard Anderson desires across the bottom 40% of Delta's network. It is a quick band aid which creates more problems in the cockpits of Endeavor airlines. One can only imagine the entitled new hire with the grumpy crusty Captain who failed his interview. It is not an idea mentoring environment and maybe not even safe (as the two semi recent deadly accidents which hit Delta's books thanks to outsourcing proved).
You should understand that you benefit when:
- Management has a problem they need our help with
- We can offer longevity, which has an immediate value and a deferred cost
- We can increase our bargaining leverage by controlling more of the market
Please don't take offense, because I want you to gain. You (and those of your seniority) have to gain or else this is a political non starter ... but ... you've let ALPA transfer money from outsourced express jobs for years. Your saying "I'm not paying it back" comes across as pretty arrogant and entitled by those of us who had our careers put on hold for a decade or more due to outsourcing.
Your opinion is political fact (truth), but it's perceived as rude to rub our noses in it.
I didn't mean to come across as arrogant. I just mean that I see no reason to buy back what will eventually come our way anyway. The RJ experiment is over... especially here at DAL. Yes they are slightly bigger, but look at UAL where they still have a million of the 50 seaters. I think the battle underlying all of this is control of those larger airframes as the 50s become more and more economically unfeasible. Hmmmmm where have I heard that line of logic before?
I'm a line dog. I have no political connections whatsoever.