Originally Posted by
cloudwarrior
Please don't be angered,
...But I bet its safe to say, given the
Current IMSL arbitration, about the 'new hire' dispute, that F9 shouldn't & wouldn't touch ANY YX or rah application with a ten foot pole. -At this time.
Your post on page 23 of This thread-is a Prime example of the current 'conflict':
At this time, we have been
Burned by the YX-8, and are currently in Open arbitration for IMSL with both ALPA & IBT Vs the F9 pilot group (new & old).
It would be prudent to
Wait, until after the IMSL ruling to apply/accept any apps from
Any party within the IMSL. --Just my 2 cents.
Once the dust settles, many cool folks (rah)
may have a real good shot here at F9.
Just my humble/crazy Opinion.
I totally understand where you are coming from. My post from page 23 basically states "If this is the rule of law, you cannot pick and chose which rules you will obey and which ones you will not" .. It's simple as that..
My stance would be the same if the Eichen awarded something heavily in favor of F9. I know it's a bitter pill to swallow.
Even though the IMSL is still common I think F9 is on the right path in terms of making it obselete. NMB ruling that F9 and RAH are not single carrier status is one of them. I hear Jun 12th is the date for the representation election. I think that will be another brick on the wall between two neighbors.
I also understand how the YX-8 ruined for the people at Frontier. At least I am happy that non of the RAH people pulled something like that. (I knew only one and he is no longer with you guys anyway) . .
Lastly a lot has happened since that post. I was a firm believer of The Slate and the leader's decisions. Looks like that leader got himself really good position in management leaving 2000 people behind.
I still believe that F9 is a good company with great future. Employees have to fight the good fight , like Spirit guys did when they had to go on strike, when the time comes.
Have a great day,