Originally Posted by
FlyZ
Splash, I see what you are saying...if something was near the bottom of a previous survey, management would know that it isn't desired as much as something else on the list. But should the negotiating team even be working very hard on something well down our list at the expense of things the membership ranked higher? Aren't we essentially telling management what we care about most by bringing those items to the table?
The example I'm thinking of was what happened in 2012.
What if some of the items that were about to be negotiated the next year, just prior to FAR 117 being put in place, were ranked very low in the 2012 survey?
Is there any risk to us with having the company know we ranked them so low?