Existing cabotage and freedom laws that prohibit it without the agreement. But you knew that.

The House amendment that just passed would slam the door on NAI, yet all it does is prevent the approval of anything already in violation of existing agreements; agreements that are directly linked to long standing cabotage and flying freedom laws. Seems like if this wasn't linked to a "law" in any way like you are implying, even that wouldn't matter, would it? I suggest you try another stratedgy to ink the waters, cause this one isn't working for you.

Is this really the arguement you want to hang your hat on? That "is it legal" depends on the definition of is?