View Single Post
Old 06-16-2014 | 05:32 AM
  #6462  
Delayed again's Avatar
Delayed again
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
I'll try to explain it. The XJT MEC's position hasn't changed since the failed TA when it comes to PBS. All they did was reiterate that. The two MECs and the company have already agreed to the Process for Interim and Single PBS that was part of that TA. So as far as the XJT MEC is concerned, that's the way forward.

Does the ASA MEC now have a different position other than what was already agreed to by all three parties in the form of the Process for Interim and Single PBS in the TA? If they do, then it's them opening up the can of worms again.
Wasn't the Process Agreement for PBS contingent on the passage of the JCBA? I'm pretty sure that thing is dead or else the L-XJT group just got PBS imposed on them without a pilot vote.