Originally Posted by
Delayed again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevets
I'll try to explain it. The XJT MEC's position hasn't changed since the failed TA when it comes to PBS. All they did was reiterate that. The two MECs and the company have already agreed to the Process for Interim and Single PBS that was part of that TA. So as far as the XJT MEC is concerned, that's the way forward.
Does the ASA MEC now have a different position other than what was already agreed to by all three parties in the form of the Process for Interim and Single PBS in the TA? If they do, then it's them opening up the can of worms again.
Wasn't the Process Agreement for PBS contingent on the passage of the JCBA? I'm pretty sure that thing is dead or else the L-XJT group just got PBS imposed on them without a pilot vote.
No, that agreement is contingent on a TA passing. But the two MECs can mutually decide that every single section of the failed TA has to be reworked and changed. I think it's safe to assume that most sections of the TA will remain untouched. But someone has decides that the Process for Interim and Single PBS agreement is no longer satisfactory to them. And judging by the latest XJT MEC communication, it wasn't them. So that only leaves the ASA MEC rehashing this PBS argument again and further delaying everything. Which is ok with me, by the way. I just want to point out to all the ASA people that it's not the XJT MEC doing this.