Old 06-22-2014 | 10:35 AM
  #95  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
80ktsClamp
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by slats fail
I think both sides make valid points here but its pretty ironic to see a bunch of mainline guys railing against this but be perfectly ok with the much bigger scam known as the regional whipsaw. I certainly don't supprt what NAI is trying to accomplish, but I can certainly can understand someone's reason for supporting it.
NAI must be defeated, and when it is we need to focus our energy on defeating the regional whipsaw. The real downward pressure on wages are the regional airlines masquerading as Delta Connection, United Express, and American Eagle, who now do approximately 50% of the domestic flying.
We are not entitled to mainline jobs, we've just been doing the job flying delta passengers in the same weather same airspace same airports, same same same for FAR LESS PAY. But dbags like MEmbrain have the nerve to say things like it has to be earned. We have earned it, we prove it everyday by flying YOUR passengers. Tell that to the 20 year Comair guy whose been forced to start over at the bottom of some other ****ball regional. We all want to earn our jobs at mainline, but stop telling guys who've been in the regionals for a decade or more after being whipsawed they've got to earn it. We get it. We need to pass an interview like everyone else, but stop acting like we don't do the exact same job.
I think congress should be addressing the issue of subcontractors impersonating real airlines. Should be illegal. If Delta sells tickets on a Delta flight, it should be flown on a Delta plane by Delta pilots period. Take the flying back!
Where has any one of the mainline pilots that have posted on here showed support of the regional scheme? Point out specific posts, please. (MEMbrain is a troll that is on very thin ice, FWIW.)

A lot of the pain in the regional world right now is being caused by DL pilots taking regional flying back while mgmt is trying to protect their cost model to keep it viable just a little bit longer. It's not a fast process, nor is it without breaking some eggs. Guys really screwed the pooch years ago when they let the camel in the tent with the outsourcing model, and it will take many years to fix as well.

So why would we even begin to think that letting this even bigger camel in is a good idea and not without dire consequences?
Reply