Originally Posted by
tsquare
I think your are taking that to too much of an extreme. And sorry, but I don't buy the whole responsibility for XX number of lives as making any one pilots' job "worth" more than another's. Sorry, I just don't. Carl might think he is more important then you or me, but the AJC will still use the same font for it's headline if you or I bend metal. So using that as a metric for determining pay... again... imho.. is pure folly and short sighted. Or maybe we should be paid for the number of people that are actually on the airplane if the responsibility for human lives is how you think we should be paid. I think the MD88 would go amazingly senior if that were the case. I think the point of a UPS/FDX comparison as far as management is concerned is from a business perspective in terms of profitability and excellence of those businesses. I think management is tired of the constant cyclical swings of this industry and are really working hard to break that cycle. Consolidation has helped immensely. The fees of which you speak are also a method to do that. As an added bonus it gets the gubbamint out of our wallet. IMHO, kudos for that.
What would be interesting is to know how much in each flight Delta pays for an insurance premium vs each FedEx or UPS departure.
With FAR 117 upon us now, I think we should be paid a "
Federal regulatory recovery fee" in addition to our Current pay. Passengers don't think twice about them now at the hotel front desk or car rental counter.
This fee would be added to each ticket, per segment and labeled as such. It would then go directly to the pilots. Add that to our current pay and no one would be talking about restoration.
Talk about management twisting into a pretzel to explain it to those working on the other side of our door.