Thread: Iraq
View Single Post
Old 06-23-2014 | 04:07 PM
  #128  
ShyGuy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,308
Likes: 249
Default

Originally Posted by Sum Ting Wong
AQ not "running" Iraq? I'd say that you're correct. But Saddam Hussein had plenty of ties to all sorts of terrorist groups, including radical Islamist jihadis. The Pentagon announced back in 2008 that an investigation into over 600,000 documents captured at the end of the invasion of Iraq showed operational links to al-Qaeda affiliated groups.

Here are excerpts from that report:

Take a look at (Extract 25) "The Army of Muhammad is working with Osama bin Laden. … “this organization is an offshoot of bin Laden, but that their objectives are similar but with different names that can be a way of camouflaging the organization.”

On pages 34-35 of the report, we find communications between their Bahrain agent and IIS (Iraqi Intelligence Service) headquarters the Iraqis list their aims as attacking Jewish and American interests anywhere in the world, attacking American embassies, disrupting American oil supplies and tankers, and attacking the American military bases in the Middle East. A later memorandum from the same collection to the Director of the IIS reports that the Army of Muhammad is endeavoring to receive assistance [from Iraq] to implement its objectives, and that the local IIS station has been told to deal with them in accordance with priorities previously established.

The Iraqi support for AoM may not be an operational link, but it’s certainly a financial link that goes right to Osama bin Laden.


The most recent military conflict during which the Left rooted for an American victory was World War II. In every fight since that time, the American Left has mischaracterized US involvement as being avaricious, acquisitive, imperialistic, or genocidal. During recent wars, the Left have augmented their practice of impugning American motives by also maligning American troops, who have been smeared as being thieves, rapists, torturers, and baby killers.

And those are just the slurs issued by our current secretary of state.


ShyGuy, you simply do not know what you are talking about.

http://a.abcnews.com/images/pdf/Pentagon_Report_V1.pdf
What is/was better:

Iraq under Saddam Hussein as in 2003

Iraq today with ISIS takeover in 2014

You are trying to justify the War in Iraq and it isn't working. No one is buying it. Saddam's links seem to have been benign with no operational input and certainly nothing to do with 9/11. Sure there are excerpts but give it time and even Maliki will make the same links/connections.