To reiterate what Denny wrote, that's a pretty ignorant broad brush statement about everyone who voted "yes" on the TA. (Whose got their "head in the sand?")

You can research my previous posts. I was neither a "yes" vote on C2012, not was I a "no" vote due to my MLOA to OAKN. So, instead of rehashing something that was already over two years ago, coincidentally the same amount of time that your beloved Southwestern has been in Section 6 negotiations, why not focus on openers due to be exchanged in less than a year for our side?

GJ