View Single Post
Old 06-30-2014 | 11:45 AM
  #161439  
finis72's Avatar
finis72
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: 777 Sim Instructor
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
I'm sure you are much smarter than I am.

I got the same numbers from my fellow 1985 hires at United and American. As you know, they both already have pay banding. 4 bands.

They both stated the productivity gain for management is around 15%.

Imagine 9 fleets/8 bases and over 800 retirements in 12 months.

From my years of doing ALPA work, I estimate each retirement to result in 8 to 10 initial training cycles. But let's use 6.

800 X 6 = 4800. 4800 initial training cycles in 12 months. Never mind the cost, who will fly the planes?

And in the years when over 800 pilot retire at age 65, how many will really retire? 1100? 1200?

Right now retirements are running at 2 for every 1 scheduled to retire at age 65.

Pay banding is a massive concession that will further stagnate our careers. And if you are already at the top? Who cares? It won't harm you.

Pull up the ladder.
If I'm not mistaken most of the retirements will come off the top paying equipment so there will still be lots of training going on which neither you nor I can quantify. What does not a proponent of pay banding mean to you ? I will be a dot long before pay banding is even an issue. I'm soon to fall off the ladder you accuse me of pulling up.