Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Actually Carl, the NDA the MEC, Admin et al sign is a Delta NDA and is ruled by SEC regulations. The MEC Confidential is different and not the same thing.
I'm certain that the NDA is a Delta authored NDA and is governed by SEC regulations. With regard to an "MEC Confidential", that's something different and not germane to what we're talking about.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
As for company financials, the company briefs the union on the financials, and the EF&A guys are there to review with the Strat Planning Committee. The MEC is briefed on this stuff, and is what is protected by the SEC NDA.
Don't disagree.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Not sure what the dust up is about.
You might start about 5 pages back if you want the context. The discussion centers on the veracity of claims that C2012 added ~400M per year in value to pilots. I've said that number is to date unproved because neither the company nor the union has shown the math on how that was derived. Others argue that the number had to be accurate because our pilot board member would have cried foul if the company tried to give misleading costing numbers to the union. That's the cliffs version of why we're discussing this.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
The Board gets Briefed as does our pilot director, the Strat Planning and EFA guys get briefed on the financials, and then the MEC gets briefed.
You're making it sound like the briefings are done together. To my knowledge, the MEC committees and MEC do
not get briefed with the Delta board members present who are also getting their briefing. Those briefings happen separately.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
The SEC NDA covers all of that stuff and is not a MEC NDA. Very different.
And all of that different than the Delta board member NDA governing behavior as a Delta board member.
Carl