View Single Post
Old 07-03-2014 | 04:07 PM
  #161817  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Carl Spackler
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
The "zero cost" was to the company from an investor perspective.
I understand that's the DALPA definition of what management stated, but it's not what management said. They've chosen not to define it further, which is interesting since it would help DALPA's poor credibility amongst pilots.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
DAL had a CAPEX expense for the MRO on the 50 seat jets, and approached the MEC about finding a way out of the CPA's with the 50 seat DCI lift and transferring the CAPEX costs for the MRO to the pilot PWA.
Again, I understand that's what you've been told by MEC administrators. That's different from actual fact.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I never saw the actual costing but this was the opportunity as explained from many Reps that were there, and the genesis of "a zero cost contract."
That's exactly right. You're believing what you were told.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
It was not zero cost to our wallets. Like it, love it or hate it, C2012 did add pilot costs to the company.
Sorry, not buying it.

Carl