View Single Post
Old 07-06-2014 | 04:41 AM
  #9  
BMEP100
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
The point of day off restoration is to get you to at minimum days off if you are under it. If your line already has more than min days your QOL already is better. What a silly complaint, especially since you get premium pay.

Silly? I don't think so, since if I had been operating the flight home I would have had the day off restored. So it comes down to where I was sitting in the airplane on my day off.

@ Packrat:
I would much rather have had a day off instead of the 1 hour add pay for losing my day off. Cencal are you willing to give up a day off for an hour pay?
It used to be that we had a choice of whether we wanted the day off restored or pay for it.

This was all promptly confirmed to me by the SSC. They say there will be a "Next Steps" article about it soon.

And to your point of "min days off" I would say this. With 27 years I would expect to have more than the "min days off". Even when Lorenzo/Breeding were running the airline in 88 I consistently had more days off than I get now, and if I lost one- I got it back.

As I get older, getting time off with my family takes on greater importance, over $$. I wish that philosophy were shared by those who wrote these rules.
Reply