Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Untrue. Our executive management described the 2012 contract as "cost neutral." They didn't say "cost neutral to pilots" as you say above, and neither have I.
Good, now we are getting somewhere. If it was cost neutral to DAL, that is perfectly fine with me. The pilots' portion of the contract cost the company money. They cut from elsewhere. This is usual Spackler bloviating about nothing and trying to make a sow's ear out of a silk purse.
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
There is absolutely no doubt that the contract was cost neutral to the company. No question.
Agreed. Now, who cares?
What's your next crisis?