Thread: Skywest
View Single Post
Old 07-14-2014 | 02:38 PM
  #5816  
Nevets
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Quote:





Originally Posted by Nevets


There are success stories most union properties. For example, and I mentioned this before, imagine how much worse things would be for Mesa pilots if JO could've done what he wanted? Also, Eagle won their arbitration that kept their flow through. And there are countless of grievances won that wouldn't have gotten the light of day without a legally binding contract that only an NMB recognized bargaining agent can negotiate and enforce.



I didn't explain myself then. I don't mean knowledge of how things are at other places. I'm talking about having a central repository of information within your group. A union, as part of making sure the contract is followed, collects information from pilots reporting alleged violations. This allows the union to know which sections are being continually violated. There is almost always a reason why the company does this. The union can bring this to their attention and find out why they are interpreting certain language differently now. It's almost always an operational or financial reason why. With that information, the union can decide whether to grieve it or if it's a benefit to the pilots or a win/win scenario, they can negotiate with the company to get something in return. It's usually clarification of the offending language in exchange to some other benefit the pilot group wants in another area, maybe clarification on another section. Many times these things turn into a Memorandum of Understanding or a Letter of Agreement that gets incorporated into the contract.

The same thing with disciplinary action. The union, by virtue of being the pilots' representative, knows ALL disciplinary hearings/investigations. Again, this information can be used to advice pilots what not to do (how not to get yourself suspended or fired) because the company is concentrating on certain things, like stealing or what not. Or if there is no basis for disciplinary action, the union, first defends the pilot (DD comes to mind), and secondly can inform the pilot of proper behavior/choices/actions that you should not be concerned about as far as getting in trouble.

The union does this from a vantage of being a federally recognized entity with certain rights and privileges and most importantly with it's own funding. In other words, it's an unbiased position to represent the pilots from without fear of any kind of retribution, as small and subtle that it more often than not it is.

So to reiterate, I'm not talking about industry knowledge of what's going on around other properties in general. I'm talking about institutional knowledge of your own property and how and why your management manages it's own employees, collecting that information, and using it to the benefit of the pilots in order to come to a more fair balance and not with the tip of the scales on the side of management. Even with a union, the scales are tipped the other way. Without one and without being able to have a legal say on how you are treated, then they are tipped even more and the only reason why you may not see it is because you are not allowed to see it as individuals. In other words, you dont now know what you don't know because you are not allowed to know.

Lastly, just because its bad at XJT or endeavor or eagle, doesn't mean that it would automatically 100% be bad somewhere else. Each property has different management, financials, culture, pay and benefits, etc. As a union, you govern yourselves. You decide how to handle the work of the union. The union doesnt decide how management deals with it's business or employees. The union only decides how to deal with how management deals with the union. It doesnt have to be adversarial. But when it needs to be, you have the option without fear of retribution. That's at least a little leverage you now have with a union.




MOD INPUT:

Nevets,

You are not a SKW airlines employee, nor an interested applicant. In the spirit of keeping this thread on track, ie about SKW life and rumors, please stop discussing union issues or SKW vs. Surejet issues here. Feel free to create new threads for those specific purposes (a union debate needs to be in the union forum).

Thanks.
Just as a point of information, it was not I who started a union discussion. I simply responded to someone who claimed the IAH UAL flying as their flying being taken by XJT, a company I currently work for. And I do believe that the TOS does allow any of these types of discussions on any thread. And if you are never interested in reading my posts, the forum allows a way of accommodating that, as some have done.