Originally Posted by
skybolt
No what's "awsome" is the fact that words do mean things. I quoted the contract. "Historical staffing" isn't found in the contract, "experience" is found in the contract.
The language is not weak. "Experience" is exact, it has a definition: (from Blacks Law Dictionary)
EXPERIENCE
1. Time spent learning a skill or field of knowledge. Superior understanding or mastery gained by actual practice acquired over months or years. 2. Known also as tenure
"maybe", "should", "possibly", "to the maximum extent possible" - these are weak.
We probably are on the same page, You say the language is weak and I'm saying that the language doesn't support the idea that most people think it supports. The language isn't weak, it is simply inapplicable.
For that matter, why are "red day" and "green day" not found in the definitions section?
The language was written for a specific purpose, and since it is "inapplicable" I would consider it weak. It isn't fulfilling the purpose the brain-trust meant when writing / accepting the verbiage. The effects of "inapplicable" and "to the greatest extent possible" are the same -whatever the company feels like doing at the time.