Originally Posted by
Plane Ramrod
The language was written for a specific purpose, and since it is "inapplicable" I would consider it weak. It isn't fulfilling the purpose the brain-trust meant when writing / accepting the verbiage. The effects of "inapplicable" and "to the greatest extent possible" are the same -whatever the company feels like doing at the time.
Can we all agree that the language just does not work? A quick read of the arbitors opinion will show that he also judged the language unworkable