Originally Posted by
Packrat
This is what you said.
Yes, and if you had critica reading skills you would realize that is
exactly what the Exxon ruling in the NBAA link I posted did - it upheld Part 91 flight departments having the same mandatory retirement age as 121 airlines.
One might note I did not write that the court required or regulated the 121 retirement age on 91 flight departments.
OK, so you have ONE example. With the airlines hiring hundreds of pilots and the regionals going begging, what do you want to bet the fractionals will be hiring more and more retiring airline pilots, especially if they have large numbers of airplanes on the order books?
I have more than one example, but its not my business to discuss what the policy of operations other than my own.
As to frax hiring retired airline pilots, you're probably right.
But for the third time, 91K isn't public common carriage and fractionals are NOT growing airframes with their orders - they are recapitalizing their existing fleets.