It's already been explained to you but you purposely ignore it in the hopes that people will think the explanations were never made to you. So for at least the tenth time, here we go again. Some reps happily voted for the TA. Some reps voted yes and said one of the reasons they did so was that the MEC administration put them in a no-win situation by signing a deal that did not meet their direction. Still other reps voted no despite the attempt by you and the rest of the MEC administrators to put them in a no-win. The obvious question was whether the MEC admins should have done that to the reps. The reps sure answered that question didn't they.

Carl