I was, for the first time ever, being a smart###. I take the blame for that not being clear. You are of course spot on.

When new 330 A and 777 A positions are being dropped on an AE they will be championed as a reason why voting for C2012 was a good thing. Probably even after C2015 is LOAed. Nevermind that it's a net loss of jets. It's how math is evidently done nowadays.

Now my guess is someone here will complain about the loss of jets and thus the international scope language is the culprit. Someone else will fire back these new planes have created X number of new jobs and we can utilize them more thus they mean more jobs then the old Jets could have ever meant. Now this is all thanks to C2012. It works, as long as you don't count the Jets leaving or already gone.