Originally Posted by
JT8D
Thanks but no. And the entire premise of your argument is fundamentally flawed. As I stated earlier, I would give no grief to a PSA pilot who had voted no and worked to alienate themself from the undercutting wh0res at that company.
Along the same lines, team Tony was a group of bumbling idiots who screwed up virtually everything related to the bankruptcy TA. As for my part, I made sure my opinion was made abundantly clear to them and later helped to purge our MEC of their remnants.
So why do you spend so much energy on PSA? What about Mesa, who is setting up shop in DFW and LAX here soon. Or Compass and their new Eagle 175s who wussed out and agreed to binding arbitration for their last contract instead of actually negotiating for an industry leading contract. And lets not forget about Republic and all their new 175s (yes I know they voted the TA down but they still agreed to work there under that contract). Or why not get your on Envoy house in order before judging other FFD contracts? Seems like PSA would be the least of your worries as you would be better off with the PSA contract than many of the other Eagle carriers. But at least you voted no to the Ch11 contract, I can respect that. Your guys definitely screwed that one up, you should have had those aircraft coming to Envoy as part of the deal.