Originally Posted by
pilotjockey
that chart up put out basically says that 4/8/3/3 and two years of nothing is more money than two years of nothing followed by 13.8/13.8/13.8 thats interesting, but in 2017 we would be $40 hour shy on method one and would need a 23% increase to catch up to method two. oh and thanks to the suggestion for the webinar from whoever, i did the 1100 one just now and it was informative, the new alpos seem to have high standards and be willing to listen and respond for a change lets just hope its not window dressing
The chart also shows that you get nothing for the first two years after C2012. What is the chance of getting three years of 13.8% in a row? Zero. I was just pointing out that once you get behind, catching up is nearly impossible. In fact, the first time any other pilot group catches us in 2016. And that is just current pay rates, once you get a couple of years out, there is no such thing as full retro pay, it is a myth.
Before C2012 the entire rest of the industry got nothing. In 2013 the rest of the industry got about 20-35% raises and were still behind us. Can you provide any explanation of why 2013 and beyond was so different from 2012 and before? If I showed that chart to 1,000 data analysts, how many would conclude that there was a clear statistical difference between before 2012 and after 2012? All 1,000? I still have not heard one clear explanation about how this difference occurred other than our C2012 changed the entire negotiating dynamic and produced these massive increases amongst the other pilot groups. Please explain it to me.