Originally Posted by
alfaromeo
Originally Posted by
DAL 88 Driver
That's slick, Alfa. Really slick.
So I guess your assumption is that we all retire at the end of 2017? Did you notice where your "average" rate is at that point in the comparison? (More importantly, did you think we wouldn't notice?)
So (for those of you in Rio Linda/Herndon)... notice that the rate in the "2 yr past amendable" example ends up at $254.22, while the rate in the C2012 example ends up at $206.50. That's going to make a difference in 2018 of almost $50 per hour, and then again in 2019 and so forth and so forth (unless something else is negotiated for those years).
Originally Posted by
pilotjockey
that chart up put out basically says that 4/8/3/3 and two years of nothing is more money than two years of nothing followed by 13.8/13.8/13.8 thats interesting, but in 2017 we would be $40 hour shy on method one and would need a 23% increase to catch up to method two. oh and thanks to the suggestion for the webinar from whoever, i did the 1100 one just now and it was informative, the new alpos seem to have high standards and be willing to listen and respond for a change lets just hope its not window dressing
I think we will do WAY better and we deserve much more, but here's what another early 4/8.5/3/3 would look like using the Alfa format:

*Disclaimer... This is purely hypothetical... Who knows what will happen next spring, it'll be better if every pilot is unified behind the Negotiating Committee....