Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes

My main beef with this is how AOPA plays it. They play it as joe and bob renting a C172, when that's not what's being proposed at all. AOPA tries to hide the fact that they lobby hard for part 91 business flying, corporate, etc. I wouldn't mind so much if they were actually representing it fairly, then we could debate the pros and cons and maybe talk about the possible repercussions and affects outside of the intentions, but as it stands, they are about scaring the GA population to benefit corporate flying.