Originally Posted by
HerkDriver
I just can't get past the fact that Capt W chose to ignore the 66.1% who wanted a "No" vote at the Executive Board. The motion still would have passed, but atleast our voices would have been heard....
ditto...you can't tell me our Chairman didn't know the final tally prior to his vote...so my question (like HerkDriver's statement) is:
"Why did our MEC Chairman chose to ignore the wishes of a majority of the membership?"
If he had voted "NO", the sky would not have fallen, the sun would still rise in the East and set on the West Coast and ALPA's position would still be for a change to the Age 60 rule and they could still sit at the grand table of influence pedaling.
With a "NO" vote he would not have pi$$ed off a vast majority of his membership.
The anarchist in me wonders if it just might be easier to de-cert the union than vote the buggers out!
http://www.unionfacts.com/articles/m...tification.cfm