Alphas explanation is below at the bottom:
Interesting.
But folks, what he is missing here and not taking into account are the two people whom are pulling the DPA strings motivation.
I will assume as fact that they are Caplinger and yes, Seham, as it seems that Tim has become quite enthralled with Lee, much to his Associations detriment.
IF there is any remote connection to Dalpa or ALPA with "John Doe" that will allow them to proceed legally, trust that they will.
DPA is no longer in a position to prevail on its own as an organized entity. Filing a suit will be out of spite for Tim, and for profit obviously for the "lawyer".
The problem is that they then get to siphon away dues money as a defense is mounted and quite possibly drain more in a judgement and settlement. That's is a problem, but minor in nature compared to possibly finding out through discovery and motions to compel that Dalpa or ALPA did have a hand in this.
I would have said it was never possible that Dalpa would be involved, but then again, I never guessed that they'd form a secret committee off the books either. That will be the target of any suit and it's not us that has to be convinced, it's a jury, and we all know how well that has worked out for ALPA before.
The real intriguing component will be seeing who lines up to be the first to throw whom under the bus, as the political blow back from a lawsuits legal fishing expedition mounts, and self preservation and vanity boil to the surface.
Originally Posted by
alfaromeo
It is immaterial if this guy had some connection to ALPA at some point in his life. Just because he ever did ALPA work does not mean ALPA sanctioned or would ever sanction this type of behavior. Since you have no case and there is no "scandal" you are trying to invent one out of thin air. The argument is that if this guy was ever connected with ALPA then ALPA is responsible.
This is a silly argument and one which normal people will see through in an instant. I can see how the DPA faithful will be rallied to chuck out some more money to their attorney, but everyone that thinks can understand that doing ALPA work does not make you an agent of ALPA for every private action you take. ALPA has a leadership structure and if ALPA ordered this action (which didn't take place) then ALPA is responsible. If this guy had some connection to ALPA and took action on his own free time then ALPA has no responsibility.