Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
I'll take DALPA's word that AF/KLM didn't want the data made public. It could have easily been done by using general terms. In the contract comparison for example, you could have added the AF/KLM items by saying: "much better than ours", better than ours", "about the same as ours", "worse than ours", "much worse than ours". That wasn't done. DALPA has the information, but chose to keep it out of the comparison in any way shape or form. That's ignoring the data.
I didn't mention anything about permission. You're the one raising it as an issue.
Again, only you are raising it.
Raising a straw man argument, then trying to infer that I'm lying is not like you Hillbilly. That's alfaromeo stuff.
Carl
Understood Carl. I shouldn't have implied you were not being truthful. I misread what you were saying. Your post gave me the impression that DALPA had the data and they made the choice to purposefully not share it, as you made no mention of lack of permission, etc. Last time around we were told the reason for it not being published in the comparison was because the other pilot groups had specifically asked DALPA not to do so. Your post only made sense to me if they had gotten permission this time, thus actually giving them a choice to make regarding whether or not they included the info in the Contract Comparison. That is why I asked for the clarification, but I agree that I shouldn't have implied you were lying.
My apologies.
Sent from PD's fridge where his drank got me leanin' using Tapatalk