View Single Post
Old 08-30-2014 | 02:54 PM
  #1168  
EdGrimley
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Sigh...I'll try one last time. I know 5191 was not on a CDO. I never said they were. They had the sleep opportunity, but they didn't get the rest. CDO's set up a structure whereby you're guaranteed to not even have the opportunity and be operating during circadian lows. 5191 was caused in large part by fatigue. Fatigue that is guaranteed by CDO's. Why would we ever do that?

Carl
Carl, it might be more accurate to say flight 5191 was caused due to lack of attention to detail which is normally associated with fatigue and circadian lows. It should be noted the solo tower controller was also said to be fatigued and did not provide a stop gap to the chain of events that ultimately cost 49 people their lives.

"In April 2007, the NTSB made four further recommendations, three measures to avoid fatigue affecting the performance of air traffic controllers."
Reply