Shouldn't it have tried to do just that Alan? Shouldn't it have (at a minimum) provided us with a truly fair and balanced look? I contend it should be heavily partisan (within the confines of truth) to show us as weak as possible compared to our peers thus justifying demanding as big an opening position as could possibly be justified. I know I'm old school now and am not going to get that, but we at least need a fair, balanced and honest comparison to our industry peers. This is just one example that shows we didn't get that. And the survey opens tomorrow. Why would my union do this Alan?

Carl