Originally Posted by
alfaromeo
You manage to string together a bunch of disconnected thoughts and attempt to make it some coherent argument. Here is how you make a contract that increases cash compensation by 19.5% cost neutral.
Please show me how we lost 1,795 pilots or will lose 1,795 pilots by 2015. Just to make your argument harder:
That is what real analysis looks like. Let's see your numbers.
It is real analysis. Your problem is that the analysis is about a different subject. You and sailingfud do that a lot. You hope that color charts somehow gives you credibility. We're not discussing "pilots required." We're discussing whether C2012 provide a net gain in value to Delta pilots. Rather than the shell game you're attempting with the graph above, you have the ability to show the data that would answer the question. You were high up in the MEC administration during C2012 so you have this data. I'll have to put my request in the next post however or else you'll ignore it and insult everything in this post.
Carl