Originally Posted by XHooker

I'm not saying "screw the 747 guys" anymore than you're saying "screw everyone else." The fences come down in a couple of years and the 747 will probably be gone around the time I can hold WB CA, so from that aspect it's irrelevant to me. It's all a question of how we want to cut the pie. I just don't see the logic of putting pay for a plane scheduled to be phased out over the life of the next contract above everything else, when it wasn't above everything else at the time of the merger.