View Single Post
Old 09-06-2014 | 02:24 PM
  #1580  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
The OOBWS nose is already under the tent and I can kinda see why....The only problem I have with it is regular line guys who commute to another base (who cannot hold a regular line in the base they are OOBWSing to) and regularly drop their trips for the month then pick up trips where they live but cannot hold a regular(or possibly even reserve) line there. Sorry, I'm just not for this kind of schedule manipulation. If one wants to fly trips in a different base, bid that base.

IMO, allowing any kind of OOBWSing, OOBSing, etc. effects total manning for the airline in a negative way because it evens out the flying and management doesn't have to do a thing. I know there is a fine line in all of this with QOL but I believe the current system we have with OOBWSing and no OOBSing is a good compromise.

Denny

Edit: OOBWS------Out of Base White Slip
OOBS--------Out of Base Swap
I would say the same should apply for out of base reserve covering trips. I don't think that scheduling should be allowed to do that.

That doesn't necessarily say I think Ts idea of regional reserve coverage should un-cap reserve days in another base. I think for the once every 6 months I get bit by capped reserve days swap denial, it would really screw reserve guys and line holders QOL overall.
Reply