Originally Posted by
tsquare
I would rather have a bigger pay increase than incur the loss of W2 that the overstaffing you advocate would probably cause. I get it... but I think it would take a ton of guys, or a cap (number) that I personally wouldn't like, or a loss of some other benefit. I cannot see how we could get this kind of manning without another huge concession.
My proposal would result in an understaffed situation, Not Overstaffed, how you can't see that is beyond me.