View Single Post
Old 09-07-2014 | 05:25 AM
  #1615  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I would rather have a bigger pay increase than incur the loss of W2 that the overstaffing you advocate would probably cause. I get it... but I think it would take a ton of guys, or a cap (number) that I personally wouldn't like, or a loss of some other benefit. I cannot see how we could get this kind of manning without another huge concession.
My proposal would result in an understaffed situation, Not Overstaffed, how you can't see that is beyond me.
Reply