Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
The reps' vote on TA2012 was to send it out to the members for a vote. Their votes were not yea or nay on the merits of TA2012.
Again, their votes were only to send it out to the members for a vote. I'm a big believer in sending everything out for memory rat.
Then you admit your reps voted against your desires. You think it should have been sent out for a member vote, and they voted against doing just that. They didn't think the members should have a right to vote on it.
Where's the outrage?