Originally Posted by
Oberon
It's not an analogy, it's an example of the sunk cost fallacy. You know, the same fallacy which you used to determine what you think our negotiating objective should be. You still haven't explained why you think "restoration" is sound economic decision making.
You'll have to forgive my assumption that "restoration" is your strategy. You haven't offered any other plan or even what you think our leverage is. Do you think stating the objective of "restoration" provides leverage? How?
When you write about restoration this is what I think of...
1. Restoration!
2. ??
3. Profit!
When you continue to write about the sunk cost fallacy it makes me think you should find a better theory from Wikipedia where you found the first one. And, it was an analogy you were trying to use. Just a very poor one.
I didn't see anyone say restoration was a strategy. That doesn't even make any sense.