Originally Posted by
Oberon
Why do you attack me? I haven't attacked anyone.
That's the same thing.
That's the same thing.
You still haven't addressed the argument. You called me "foolish" and "stubborn" and cited two pretty clear examples of making economic decisions based on some past loss.
If history was erased and you had to make a decision on what the maximum we could possibly get in the next contract would it be the same number of whatever you define "restoration" as?
So the MEC said "restoration" in 2001 and the company gave in? The final contract didn't have anything to do with the economics of the times?
Also, when did the MEC do Family Awareness meetings for C2001? I realize I asked this before but no one replied and I'm genuinely curious.
Since you didn't quote who said all that gar-bage, and I haven't read it elsewhere, I think it is safe to assume it was Carl. It has his fingerprints all over it. You just have to remember that he's the smartest man in the room.... just like he told you. You don't have to attack him personally, just his so-called facts, and his panties will get all bunched up. Ain't it fun to watch?