View Single Post
Old 09-17-2014 | 02:34 PM
  #1963  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
DAL 88 Driver
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Longevity based. And you could also use the aircraft you are on based on polling our pilots and using their desires.

I don't think it is on the table or possible, but it would force management to be productive with our time. Also, it is such a large concession, it would have to come with serious increases in w-2. I haven't looked at my time away from base total in a long time. Perhaps $100/hr is too low.

Using our average time away from base, we would need to hit 2004 rates plus inflation. I.e. Narrow body captain 300 hours time away from base $330,000. So $110/hr.
I like the out of the box thinking, Jerry. But I don't think TAFB would ever fly, as that would include being paid full rates while sleeping in the hotel. What would make sense to me would be getting paid our hourly rate during the entire time we are on duty, just like pretty much every other hourly worker known to man.

Just playing around with some numbers...

Let's say the average duty day is 8 hours. Let's say the MD-88/90 Captain rate is $200/hour. If the average MD-88/90 Captain works 16 days per month, that would be $307,200 for the year.

The current contract 2015 rate for MD-88/89 Captain is $205.56. If the average MD-88/90 Captain is paid for 1,100 hours in a year (including vacation, sick, etc.), that translates to $226,116.

Back in 2004 (last year of C2K rates), I'm guessing the average Captain was getting paid for something in the neighborhood of 1,000 hours per year. The rate was approx. $240... so that translates to $240K annually. Adjusted for inflation, that would be $308K in 2015.

Conclusion: We could leave our pay rates essentially as they are today and have full restoration of our W2 buying power by adjusting the way we are paid to match the way just about every other hourly worker in this country is paid.

Just some food for thought...
Reply