Originally Posted by
captlonestar
We have a PBS transition in place that will allow you to use your PBS for the duration of the next contract. The contact after that we would get to compare our PBS systems and make educated decisions about which system we want to keep. What is wrong with that? How is that not a great compromise that both sides can live with?
Also, our line bidding allows us a great QOL and excellent work rules. We are going to protect that QOL fiercely with rules in SmartPerf. Why not at least see what we can come up with? You never know it might be better than your current system
Parallel bidding doesn't really work because not everyone participates in the parallel bid. In addition, it is going to cost money to run two separate systems. Who is going to pay for it?
One of the reasons I voted NO was because of the two different contracts within the TA. I want one system and one contract. Not these two separate systems.
I bet you don't even know how our system works. You never know, maybe our system is great. How do you know what our system is like?