What I'm trying to say, is that if your statement that this seatlock issue will fix itself due to natural flow is accurate, what would it cost the company anything to make it shorter in the contract? And back to the original idea, even if it does cost the company money, it's a big deal and something we should fight for. You never know what will happen in the future, what airplanes we might add or how we might grow or stagnate. That's the whole purpose of the contract, these things can't be left to chance.