Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
We'll put you down as favoring longer training freezes (a significant concession) to fund our improvements.
While I certainly agree that longer freezes would be a concession, I'm not sure that I've read him post anything about that. Before you (and whoever else you're referring to) "put him down" for that, could I trouble you to point out the post in which he did?
Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
Alan Shore (a DALPA operative, as evidenced by the fact that I disagree with him) also attempted to paint longer training freezes as a positive using that same (ridiculous) straw man argument.
Same request. Please show us all the post in which I stated anything positive about longer freezes. In fact, I agreed with your original response to me on the subject by saying that longer freezes are neither appropriate nor desired.
Fixed your post for you, btw.
Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
Apparently you two are the only guys on the property who think longer freezes will improve our QOL.
Apparently, you are the only guy on the property who cannot read and comprehend the English language. Please lay off whatever is in that purple can of yours long enough to reread my posts, take them for what they are (one pilot's opinion), and stop putting words in my mouth!!