Originally Posted by
index
No, that's absolutely not what I'm saying. I never suggested ALPA should should have "advocated for their firing." Where did you dream up that nonsense? You're trying to put words in my mouth to make your point. Fail on your part.
Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
Kindly go back and re read your response to my post.
I only discussed the article. You made a full on personal attack full of misrepresentations.
At least we know you are sensitive to misrepresentations when you feel they involve your writing. What you do to others ... not as much.
Kindly go back and re read who the above referenced quote was directed to. (Hint: it was satchip, not you)
To keep my response (above) in context, here's exactly what satchip said:
Originally Posted by
satchip
So ALPA, who represented some of those non ATP certified pilots already flying for 121 carriers, should have advocated for their firing? Cause, that's what you [sic] saying....
Is that the kind of representation we can expect from you (people who wish to replace ALPA with some unnamed organization)?
What he claimed I implied is a complete misrepresentation of what I actually said. But you knew that already.