Originally Posted by Oberon

So we're clear, you have looked at the facts and come to the conclusion that I am acting on behalf of Ford & Harrison when I post? If not Ford & Harrison, who exactly?

You tell me what nomenclature you want to use and I'll use it. When we figure that out maybe you'll answer my question. What changed? I was not part of the group you are referring to, I disagreed with you, now I'm part of the group you are referring to.

Disagree with Carl, "you are a member of a group who wants to minimize pilot cost".

Defend yourself, "that's exactly what a member of a group who wants to minimize pilot cost would say".

Except that you haven't posted a quote from the article. You've said "Moak stated" and then paraphrased what the author said Moak was doing. There is a difference between a quote and what the author of the article wrote.

I believe you know the difference between a quote and what the author wrote but are choosing to ignore it because it doesn't fit your editorial.

Am I plugged in to ALPA or Ford & Harrison? Are they working together?

I worked on the PBS committee at Compass. It's a non-political committee. I was barely plugged into the goings-on at Compass. I'm sad to say the majority of my Delta political knowledge comes from APC.

What about the words in my posts that aren't for the purpose of minimizing pilot cost? Is that just cover for my true identity as a member of the group who wants to minimize cost (you need to let me know what you want to call this group soon, DALPA operative or company spy is a lot easier to type).