It's not a new tactic, my brother. You continue to assert that those words were used, and have drug out several quotes that do not use those words. Now that each of those have been debunked, you suddenly decide that it must have been in an article that was published 2.5 years ago, but that no one can find anymore. That's new.

Regarding waiting 2.5 years, I only joined this board late last year, and have only heard about this article today. Sorry if I missed it's posting previously.